C-Poll

The latest C-Poll is closed. You can read all about it here!

September 29, 2004

Expos possibly coming to DC, landowners may be ejected

Reader RJD alerted me to this article in the Washington Post reporting that the site chosen for construction of a new baseball stadium for the Montreal Expos (provided DC is selected as their new home) happens to belong currently to over two dozen property owners. This followup article indicates that the owners know that there's not much they can do to keep their property if the city wants it, and that the city will come out on the better end of any deals that are made:
Most of the dozen property owners interviewed last week said they are reluctant to sell their holdings but think they are somewhat helpless and resigned to having to do so if Washington gets a baseball team. They said they would try to negotiate the best price for their land, aware that the District has limited resources and is prepared to use the right of eminent domain to force a sale.

UPDATE:
The Expos' move to DC appears to be a done deal.

CBS' Late Show mocks CBS Evening News

      CBS's Late Show with David Letterman on Monday and Tuesday night featured mocking promos for the CBS Evening News, complete with a real CBS Evening News on screen graphic and a realistic-sounding announcer.

     Monday's: "Tonight on the CBS Evening News: The latest on the presidential campaign, based on stuff we heard from a guy at the Steak n' Shake. Only on the CBS Evening News."

     Tuesday's, over matching photos: "Tonight on the CBS Evening News: What do Saddam Hussein, Ralph Nader, Britney Spears and these chickens have in common? We don't know, but we'll make something up by air time. That's tonight, only on the CBS Evening News."

     Not exactly a vote of confidence for the staff of CBS News when one of the shows on your own network finds you a ripe target for ridicule.

 

Whites-only business district proposal divides city

There is a city in the northern U.S. that is over 80% white. The fastest-growing part of the population is not the whites, but rather various minority groups. Even worse for the white majority, these minority groups, which include immigrant newcomers, are hardworking and entrepeneurial, and are steadily eating into the employment and business opportunities that traditionally have been enjoyed by the majority. The city was already economically distressed, so the decrease in opportunities for white workers has become a matter of serious concern.

The white-dominated city council, observing this trend with alarm, has endorsed a proposal to create a special business district reserved exclusively for white business owners. The proposal also sets up a government-backed loan program exclusively for whites.

Predictably, leaders of the various minority communities are up in arms. "We are opposed to any government action that distributes public money based on race," said an Asian-Pacific-American representative. Other minority groups have chimed in as well, insisting that the hard economic times are affecting everyone, and that if there is a government program, it should benefit everyone.

Pause.

Okay, time to 'fess up. Everything I related above is true, with one exception. The city, Detroit, is over 80% black. The Free Press reports that the proposal sets up a business district exclusively for black businesses. The loan fund would be reserved for blacks.

The reaction of the immigrant communities was as related above, but what I didn't mention was that the report in which the proposal is given refers to the immigrant communities in what appears to be a deliberately insulting manner:
The report refers to Dearborn as Arabtown, and says Hispanics, Asians and Arabs are classified as whites so they enjoy benefits denied blacks.

Detroit's Latino activists said they were galled by one reference that read: "Even though legal and illegal Hispanics constitute only 3 percent of Detroit's population and 90 percent have been in the country less than 25 years, Hispanics aggressively demand inclusion in local affirmative action programs and in elected positions ... Rather than either distinguishing the situation of blacks and Hispanics, or pointing out that blacks are the majority population and therefore can elect who they wish, local political forces have instead acceded to these demands."

At least one member of the city council recognized the obvious fact that the proposal could not legally be implemented, and so voted against it. On the other hand we have the Council President Pro Tem, who ignored the legal issues because of the perceived positive social impact for the black community, and so voted for the proposal.

I suppose that there are many observations to draw from this story, but there are two that I wish to highlight. First: whenever a society becomes accustomed to the idea of preferences for minority groups, it becomes inevitable that racial favors will be distributed unequally -- in proportion to the political power of each group. If one of the favored groups attains an absolute majority of power, that now-majority group will eventually attempt to manipulate the preference system so that their former fellow-victims are left out in the cold.

Second: In the name of benefiting a favored ethnic group, the clear intent of established law is often ignored. Although it's outside the scope of this particular story, it is also often true that anybody who raises this point is branded a racist. As I probably will be because of the fact that I've reported on this in a disapproving manner.

(Credit: Roger Clegg, NRO)

September 28, 2004

Something to remember between now and November

Making the e-mail rounds....


THIS IS A NONPARTISAN JOKE THAT CAN BE ENJOYED BY BOTH PARTIES!

While walking down the street one day a US senator is tragically hit by a truck and dies.

His soul arrives in heaven and is met by St. Peter at the entrance.

"Welcome to heaven," says St. Peter. "Before you settle in, it seems there is a problem. We seldom see a high official around these parts, you see, so we're not sure what to do with you."

"No problem, just let me in," says the man.

"Well, I'd like to, but I have orders from higher up. What we'll do is have you spend one day in hell and one in heaven. Then you can choose where to spend eternity."

"Really, I've made up my mind. I want to be in heaven," says the senator. "I'm sorry but we have our rules."

And with that, St. Peter escorts him to the elevator and he goes down, down, down to hell. The doors open and he finds himself in the middle of a green golf course. In the distance is a clubhouse and standing in front of it are all his friends and other politicians who had worked with him.

Everyone is very happy and in evening dress. They run to greet him, shake his hand, and reminisce about the good times they had while getting rich at expense of the people.

They play a friendly game of golf and then dine on lobster, caviar and champagne.

Also present is the devil, which really is a very friendly guy who has a good time dancing and telling jokes. They are having such a good time that before he realizes it, it is time to go.

Everyone gives him a hearty farewell and waves while the elevator rises...

The elevator goes up, up, up and the door reopens on heaven where St. Peter is waiting for him. "Now it's time to visit heaven."

So, 24 hours pass with the head of state joining a group of contented souls moving from cloud to cloud, playing the harp and singing. They have a good time and, before he realizes it, the 24 hours have gone by and St. Peter returns.

"Well, then, you've spent a day in hell and another in heaven. Now choose your eternity."

The senator reflects for a minute, then the senator answers "Well, I would never have said it before, I mean heaven has been delightful, but I think I would be better off in hell."

So St. Peter escorts him to the elevator and he goes down, down, down to hell.

Now the doors of the elevator open and he's in the middle of a barren land covered with waste and garbage.

He sees all his friends, dressed in rags, picking up the trash and putting it in black bags as more trash falls from above.

The devil comes over to him and puts his arm around his shoulder.

"I don't understand," stammers the senator. "Yesterday I was here and there was a golf course and clubhouse, and we ate lobster and caviar, drank champagne, and danced and had a great time. Now all there is a wasteland full of garbage and my friends look miserable. What happened?"

The devil looks at him, smiles and says, "Yesterday we were campaigning...... Today you voted.

(Credit: Thanks, Dad!)

US Supremes accept eminent domain abuse case

Potentially good news for those who believe that local governments have gone insane with the practice of seizing private property and giving it to someone who promises more tax revenues:
The Supreme Court agreed Tuesday to decide when governments may seize people's homes and businesses for economic development projects, a key question as cash-strapped cities seek ways to generate tax revenue.

At issue is the scope of the Fifth Amendment, which allows governments to take private property through eminent domain, provided the owner is given "just compensation" and the land is for "public use."

This is the New London, Connecticut case -- one of the most egregious land-seizure cases currently in the legal system. Look at how New London justifies its intentions:

New London contends the condemnations are proper because the development plans serving a "public purpose" - such as boosting economic growth - are valid "public use" projects that outweigh the property rights of the homeowners.

This logic essentially destroys all barriers to land seizures -- land owners occupy their property at the pleasure of the local government. Even worse, the Connecticut Supremes endorsed the city's claim (emphasis added):

The Connecticut Supreme Court agreed with New London, ruling 4-3 in March that the mere promise of additional tax revenue justified the condemnation.

Here's to hoping that the U.S. Supremes restore some sanity to the fifth amendment by smacking the defendants silly.

(Credit: ETD)

September 24, 2004

AP is still shilling for environmental alarmists

Opening paragraph of an AP story on California's crippling new anti-smog regulations (emphasis added):
California air regulators on Friday unanimously approved the world's most ambitious rules to reduce the car emissions that contribute to global warming, a move that could bring sweeping changes to how the rest of the nation fights vehicle pollution.
Given the certainty of this assertion by the article's author, Tim Molloy, I was surprised to see this in the fifth paragraph:
 Heat-trapping greenhouse gases are believed by many scientists to contribute to global warming.
Keep the faith, Mr. Molloy!  Don't let the lack of scientific consensus deter you!

The curse of a "free" car

The consequences of Oprah's car giveaway illustrate just about everything that's wrong with our current income tax system.

The 'Star Wars' guide to Campaign 2004

Swimming Through the Spin has an outrageously funny analysis of which Star Wars characters Sen. Kerry and Pres. Bush most closely resemble.  Be sure to check the reader comments also.
 
(Credit: Best of the Web)

Reuters still shilling for Palestinian terrorists

Read this Reuters article about the family of the Palestinian woman who murdered two Israeli men in a suicide terror attack.  Here's how it begins:
Relatives of Zeinab Abu Salem had little time to absorb the shock after the 18-year-old blew herself up in a suicide attack in Jerusalem.

They rushed instead to empty the family home in the Palestinian refugee camp of Askar near the West Bank city of Nablus, expecting Israeli bulldozers to soon come to demolish it.

Reading the entire article, one would conclude that the woman came from a poverty-stricken family (thus supporting the myth that poverty breeds terror).  However, as it turns out, Zeinab Abu Salem's family is quite wealthy: she was the hostess of a children's program at a TV station owned by her family.

You'd never know that by reading Reuters dispatches, though.  And, as Best of the Web observes, Reuters can't spare any sympathy for the families of the two murdered men.

 

September 22, 2004

Some schools becoming peanut-free zones

I can certainly sympathize with the decision of this school district to ban peanut (and certain other nut) products -- my son is allergic to peanuts. I'm wondering, though: where were all of these sensitive people when I was growing up? The explanation given in the article does not seem persuasive:
An allergy specialist at Eastern Maine Medical Center says such allergies are on the rise because of an increasingly nut-rich American diet.
"On the rise"... I wasn't aware of any incidences of the allergy more than 15 or so years ago. They may have been there, but they were completely off the radar. I would also be interested in seeing some details regarding how the American diet has been increasingly nut-rich in recent years.

September 21, 2004

Law and morality

Dennis Prager nails an important distinction between the Left and (much of) the Right: the Left views law as an end in itself, rather than a means to an end.
In fact, since it lacks the self-control apparatus that is a major part of religion, the Left passes more and more laws to control people. That is why there is a direct link between the decline in Judeo-Christian religion and the increase in governmental laws controlling human behavior.
In a way, it might be dangerous if we small-government conservatives got our wish. So much of America has lost its moral compass that it can't function civilly without the heavy hand of law to regulate its behavior.

Texas Hill Country serenity

And now for something completely different.

I've been away from the blog for a few days due to some traveling and to an otherwise hectic schedule. This past weekend I took my wife and son to visit family in the Texas Hill Country. While there, I took this picture of the Guadalupe River at Ingram (about 5 miles from Kerrville). Click on the picture to see more detail. (Hi-res here)

The photo just oozes serenity, so much so that I've made it my desktop wallpaper as an antidote to the many stresses of the day. May it be so for you as well.


September 15, 2004

Great moments in journalism

Best of the Web credits the New York Times for "what may be the greatest headline ever":

Memos on Bush are Fake but Accurate, Typist Says

Boortz has a plan to save America

From today's Nuze:
How to save the nation? Get the subscription list for People Magazine. Revoke the voter registration of any person on that list.
Let me know if you need me to explain this.


September 14, 2004

Abagnale scoffs at inept forgeries

Frank Abagnale, Jr., the legendary con-man whose exploits were recounted in the movie Catch Me If You Can, is not impressed with the quality of the forged documents pushed by CBS.  The following is from an e-mail sent by one of Abagnale's associates:
Though Mr. Abagnale has not personally seen the documents or copies of the documents, from what he has seen on television he believes the documents are forgeries.  He feels this should be evident to anyone of any knowledge of forged documents.

I can tell you that he sent an e-mail to Neil Cavuto of Your World on Fox News Network (he knows him personally) that stated:  "If my forgeries looked as bad as the CBS documents, it would have been "Catch Me In Two Days".